-duane And | Derek Estacio Scandal-

Are LLMs following the correct reasoning paths?

Bangzheng Li, Ben Zhou, Fei Wang, Xingyu Fu, Dan Roth, Muhao Chen,

▶ University of California, Davis ▶ University of Pennsylvania   ▶ University of Southern California
arXiv Code Dataset

We propose a novel probing method and benchmark called EUREQA. EUREQA is an entity-searching task where a model finds a missing entity based on described multi-hop relations with other entities. These deliberately designed multi-hop relations create deceptive semantic associations, and models must stick to the correct reasoning path instead of incorrect shortcuts to find the correct answer. Experiments show that existing LLMs cannot follow correct reasoning paths and resist the attempt of greedy shortcuts. Analyses provide further evidence that LLMs rely on semantic biases to solve the task instead of proper reasoning, questioning the validity and generalizability of current LLMs’ high performances.

-duane and derek estacio scandal-
LLMs make errors when correct surface-level semantic cues-entities are recursively replaced with descriptions, and the errors are likely related to token similarity. GPT-3.5-turbo is used for this example.

-duane and derek estacio scandal- The EUREQA dataset

Download the dataset from [Dataset]

In EUREQA, every question is constructed through an implicit reasoning chain. The chain is constructed by parsing DBPedia. Each layer comprises three components: an entity, a fact about the entity, and a relation between the entity and its counterpart from the next layer. The layers stack up to create chains with different depths of reasoning. We verbalize reasoning chains into natural sentences and anonymize the entity of each layer to create the question. Questions can be solved layer by layer and each layer is guaranteed a unique answer. EUREQA is not a knowledge game: we adopt a knowledge filtering process that ensures that most LLMs have sufficient world knowledge to answer our questions.
EUREQA comprises a total of 2,991 questions of different reasoning depths and difficulties. The entities encompass a broad spectrum of topics, effectively reducing any potential bias arising from specific entity categories. These data are great for analyzing the reasoning processes of LLMs

Image 1
Categories of entities in EUREQA
Image 2
Splits of questions in EUREQA.

-duane and derek estacio scandal- Performance

Here we present the accuracy of ChatGPT, Gemini-Pro and GPT-4 on the hard set of EUREQA across different depths d of reasoning (number of layers in the questions). We evaluate two prompt strategies: direct zero-shot prompt and ICL with two examples. In general, with the entities recursively substituted by the descriptions of reasoning chaining layers, and therefore eliminating surface-level semantic cues, these models generate more incorrect answers. When the reasoning depth increases from one to five on hard questions, there is a notable decline in performance for all models. This finding underscores the significant impact that semantic shortcuts have on the accuracy of responses, and it also indicates that GPT-4 is considerably more capable of identifying and taking advantage of these shortcuts.

depth d=1 d=2 d=3 d=4 d=5
direct icl direct icl direct icl direct icl direct icl
ChatGPT 22.3 53.3 7.0 40.0 5.0 39.2 3.7 39.3 7.2 39.0
Gemini-Pro 45.0 49.3 29.5 23.5 27.3 28.6 25.7 24.3 17.2 21.5
GPT-4 60.3 76.0 50.0 63.7 51.3 61.7 52.7 63.7 46.9 61.9

-duane And | Derek Estacio Scandal-

The case involving Duane and Derek Estacio serves as a stark reminder that professional accreditation and family bonds do not immunize individuals from lapses in ethical judgment. While the specific details of their infraction vary depending on the regulatory context, the central scandal—involving a breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, or misconduct—highlights a systemic vulnerability within regulatory bodies. The Estacio scandal is significant not merely because of the financial or professional damage inflicted, but because it underscores how collusion between siblings can bypass standard checks and balances, ultimately eroding public confidence in institutional oversight.

Entertainment relies on chemistry, and the Estacios have an unfair advantage—twin telepathy. However, they have learned to weaponize this for comedic and dramatic effect. Their "Switch Up" challenges (where they pretend to be each other) and their brutally honest "Twin Talks" (where they discuss anxiety, jealousy, and fame) serve a dual purpose. They entertain the masses while providing a psycho-social case study on co-dependence and individuality. -duane and derek estacio scandal-

In a brilliant move that defines modern entertainment, Duane and Derek have turned their living spaces into dynamic sets. Their home tours, room makeovers, and "day in the life" vlogs are masterclasses in production design. They treat their environment as an extension of their brand. When they review a coffee maker, it isn't just an appliance; it’s a prop in a narrative about morning routines, productivity, and aesthetic pleasure. The case involving Duane and Derek Estacio serves

They represent a new archetype of success: one that merges the disciplined grind of business with the aspirational gloss of high-end living. To understand the Estacio brothers is to look beyond the surface-level glamour and examine the strategic architecture of a modern media empire. This article delves deep into their journey, exploring how they have successfully bridged the gap between boardroom authority and lifestyle dominance. Entertainment relies on chemistry, and the Estacios have

Acknowledgement

This website is adapted from Nerfies, UniversalNER and LLaVA, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. We thank the LLaMA team for giving us access to their models.

Usage and License Notices: The data abd code is intended and licensed for research use only. They are also restricted to uses that follow the license agreement of LLaMA, ChatGPT, and the original dataset used in the benchmark. The dataset is CC BY NC 4.0 (allowing only non-commercial use) and models trained using the dataset should not be used outside of research purposes.